weekly managing-partner view

content performance report

Full-year import: 2025-08-24 → 2026-08-23. All GA4-derived views exclude Ashburn. GA4 is imported at full-year granularity; HubSpot sends (May–Aug 2026) and LinkedIn posts (Oct 2021–Aug 2026 from the D: store) are included where available in the connected sources. Exact source-to-article attribution is only shown where the GA4 UTM layer supports it.
HubSpot email performance
LinkedIn post performance
GA4 site and article traffic · full year
Ashburn excluded
prepared in Hermes · interactive HTML · static import (no live backend)
Pageviews in range
Email clicks
LinkedIn clicks
Top article page
What mattered most · selected range
    Site traffic rhythm · selected range
    Where sessions came from · selected range
    Quick read
    Path to GA4 manual-UTM-tracked article sessions · Ashburn removed
    How to read this view
      Email drop-off
      Email sends by clicks
      LinkedIn impression → click conversion
      Recent post CTR
      LinkedIn posts · impressions vs clicks
      Website-driving LinkedIn leaders · selected range
        LinkedIn post table
        Top article destination pages in GA4 · selected range
        Article-side read · selected range
          Top destination article pages
          Top site pages · selected range
          What still needs a better join
          The remaining analytical gap is clean article attribution back to each individual email and social post. This report measures feeder performance and destination performance accurately; the next improvement is a stronger URL- or campaign-level join between the two.
          Likely bot-heavy direct traffic to monitor
          The suspicious geo pattern is concentrated inside Direct, not the controlled feeder channels. Ashburn is excluded across all GA4-derived views in this dashboard. The cards above are a recent monitoring snapshot, not a range-filtered slice.
          Email send table · selected range
          GA4 UTM reconciliation · Ashburn removed
          Estimated read time vs measured engaged time
          What this page is showing
          • Estimated read time is based on article word count at roughly 225 words/minute.
          • Measured engaged time comes from GA4 user engagement duration divided by sessions for each article.
          • Word counts are verified article-body counts for the 2026 articles; legacy article counts (marked ≈) are page-text estimates.
          Because Ashburn is excluded across the dashboard's GA4-derived layer, these comparisons are cleaner than earlier drafts. They are directional, not a literal completion metric. Article bodies end around 60–71% of full page height on this template, so a blunt 90% scroll proxy would undercount true completion.
          Estimated completion ratio by article
          Reading-time highlights
          Article reading-time table